5 Differences Between Workflow Automation & Business Process Automation

By
Shariq Ansari
October 6, 2023
5 mins to read
Difference between workflow automation and business process automation

In today's landscape, organizations are constantly seeking ways to streamline their operations, increase efficiency, and reduce costs. Two popular approaches that have gained significant traction in recent years are Workflow Automation and Business Process Automation. While both concepts revolve around the idea of automating tasks, there are key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will delve into the nuances of workflow automation and business process automation, exploring their roles in modern business and highlighting five key differences between them.

Before delving into the differences between workflow automation and business process automation, it's important to have a clear understanding of what automation in business entails. At its core, automation aims to allow businesses to delegate repetitive and mundane tasks to machines, freeing up valuable resources and manpower for more strategic activities.

What is Workflow Automation?

Workflow automation is a powerful tool that enables organizations to standardize and optimize their processes, resulting in increased efficiency and cost savings. With workflow automation, organizations can define and enforce consistent processes, ensuring that tasks are completed in a timely and consistent manner.

Moreover, workflow automation allows for better visibility and tracking of tasks, as it provides real-time updates on the progress of workflows. This enables organizations to identify bottlenecks and inefficiencies, allowing for continuous improvement and optimization of processes.

What is Business Process Automation?

While workflow automation focuses on automating specific tasks and processes, business process automation (BPA) takes a broader approach. BPA encompasses the automation of entire business processes, aiming to optimize and automate end-to-end workflows.

By automating business processes, organizations can achieve a seamless flow of information and tasks across various departments and systems. This integration eliminates silos and improves collaboration, as different teams can easily access and share information.

BPA also enables organizations to implement business rules and logic, ensuring that processes are executed consistently and in accordance with predefined guidelines. This reduces the risk of errors and ensures compliance with regulatory requirements.

Now that we have a solid understanding of automation in business and its role in improving efficiency and reducing costs, let's dive into the key differences between workflow automation and business process automation. Workflow automation and business process automation are both valuable tools for optimizing and streamlining business operations. While they share similarities in their goals of increasing efficiency and reducing manual effort, there are key differences between the two approaches.

Difference in Scope

The first notable difference between workflow automation and business process automation lies in their scope. Workflow automation focuses on automating specific tasks or workflows within a department or team, while business process automation aims to automate the entire end-to-end process. Workflow automation is more granular and allows businesses to target and optimize individual steps, whereas business process automation takes a holistic approach.

For example, in a marketing department, workflow automation might be used to automate the process of creating and sending email campaigns. This could involve automating the steps of designing the email template, segmenting the recipient list, and scheduling the send.

On the other hand, business process automation takes a broader approach, encompassing the entire workflow that spans across multiple departments or systems. It looks at the end-to-end process and seeks to automate and optimize the entire flow of work.

Continuing with the marketing department example, business process automation might involve automating the entire campaign management process, from initial campaign ideation and planning, through content creation and approval, to final execution and reporting. This would involve integrating various systems and departments, such as CRM software, content management systems, and analytics platforms.

Difference in Complexity

Workflow automation is generally less complex compared to business process automation. Since it deals with individual tasks or activities, the automation logic can be relatively straightforward.

On the other hand, business process automation involves multiple steps, interactions, dependencies, and decision points, making it inherently more complex. Business process automation requires careful analysis, mapping, and alignment of various processes and their relationships to ensure seamless integration and execution.

For instance, in a customer service department, workflow automation may involve automating the process of responding to customer inquiries. This can be achieved by setting up automated email responses or chatbots.

In contrast, business process automation in the same department would involve automating the entire customer service journey, from initial contact to issue resolution, including routing inquiries to the appropriate department or agent based on predefined rules.

Difference in Implementation

Another distinguishing factor between workflow automation and business process automation is the implementation process. Workflow automation often involves the use of specialized software or tools that are designed to automate specific tasks or processes.

These tools typically require minimal customization and can be implemented relatively quickly. They are often user-friendly and accessible to non-technical users, allowing teams to define workflows, set rules, and automate tasks easily without extensive training or IT involvement. With just a few clicks, businesses can streamline their operations and reduce manual effort.

Business process automation, however, often requires a more complex implementation process. It involves the integration of disparate systems and the re-engineering of entire business processes to ensure seamless automation across departments.

For example, automating the supply chain would require integrating systems such as inventory management, order processing, and shipping logistics. It would also involve redefining and optimizing the entire supply chain workflow to eliminate inefficiencies and bottlenecks.

Difference in Flexibility

Workflow automation offers a higher degree of flexibility, since it focuses on specific workflows or tasks. Companies can choose to automate only the most repetitive and time-consuming tasks, leaving room for manual intervention in other areas.

Workflow automation allows for quick and agile changes to be made as needed, providing businesses with the ability to adapt to evolving needs. For example, if a company decides to change its approval process, it can easily modify the workflow automation software to reflect the new requirements.

On the other hand, business process automation, given its end-to-end nature, offers less flexibility in terms of manual intervention. The goal is to achieve a seamless, automated flow of activities and decisions. Exception handling and manual interventions are generally minimized in business process automation to maintain efficiency.

For instance, in a finance department, workflow automation may involve automating the invoice approval process, ensuring that invoices are routed to the appropriate approvers based on predefined rules. Business process automation in the same department would involve automating the entire procure-to-pay process, from purchase requisition to invoice payment, with minimal manual intervention.

Difference in Control

Lastly, there is a difference in the level of control that businesses have over the two. With workflow automation, organizations have more control over individual tasks and can make real-time adjustments as needed.

Business process automation, due to its complexity and integration requirements, often requires stringent governance and centralized control. Since it spans multiple departments and functions, maintaining centralized control ensures consistency and compliance across the entire process.

Businesses can monitor and track the progress of each task, identify bottlenecks, and make necessary adjustments. In contrast, business process automation provides less granular control, with limited control over individual tasks.

For example, a customer service department may use workflow automation to automate the ticketing system. The software allows agents to track the status of each ticket, assign tasks, and escalate issues. In contrast, if the department decides to implement business process automation for the entire customer service process, including call routing, knowledge base management, and customer feedback analysis, the level of control over each individual task may be reduced.

Both Workflow Automation and Business Process Automation are powerful tools in the quest for operational excellence. While WFA zeroes in on the intricacies of task sequences, BPA is all about the bird's eye view, strategizing for holistic excellence. For businesses, the key is to discern which approach—or perhaps a blend of both—is best suited to their unique needs and goals. As with all things in business, clarity of purpose is half the battle won. Armed with a clear understanding of WFA and BPA, companies can harness these tools to drive unprecedented efficiency and growth.

Get In Touch
Download Now
Share this post
Shariq Ansari
Digital Marketeer
“Using Grid to track drill program progress and day to day expenditures has allowed VR Resources to make better decisions more quickly. The highly customizable and elegant interface allows me to track and manage all aspects of our field work and it’s clear after just a few weeks that the possibilities are nearly endless. Cost tracking estimates were consistently within expected variance of invoices received giving me further confidence in managing agile drill programs. Further the development team and customer support have been top notch!”
Justin J. Daley
PGeo, MSc, Vice President Exploration
VR Resources
Download
VR Resources
“Grid has been extremely helpful in changing the course of multiple operations, here at U-Solar. We started with one module for Materials Management, and have now adopted Grid for 3-4 more processes, all of which have been smooth and quick to implement.”
Namrata
IT Admin
U-Solar
Download
U-Solar
“GRID has helped Hotel Polo Towers group to manage their assets and inventory through its simple, user-friendly yet dynamic application. Managing asset data have really been simple and it goes without saying that the technical support team members have done a tremendous job by providing quick and effective troubleshooting measures whenever required.”
Anirban Chatterjee
IT Manager - Corporate
Hotel Polo Towers
Download
Hotel Polo Towers
“We assessed many platforms before going ahead with Grid. The turnaround time for implementation has been phenomenal with a direct impact on dealer engagement. We are looking to deploy Grid for a lot of our business functions and other group companies.”
Rajneesh Singh
Vice President (IT & SAP)
Hop Electric
Download
Hop Electric
Only business email addresses are allowed.